A Preferential Model Semantics For Default Logic
نویسنده
چکیده
Shoham, proposed, a uniform approach to systems for nonmonotonic reasoning, which consists in considering standard logics augmented with a preference relation on the interpretations. Circumscription can easily -seen. to be a special case of this preference logic framework, but capturing default logic turned out to-be, more difficult, and is even thought to be impossible by some researchers of nonmonotonic reasoning. In this paper a preferential model semantics for default logic is given, by defining a preference relation on partial models called hypervaluations. Alternatively, Kripke models for K45 could have been used instead of hypervaluations. The given semantics slightly strengthens Shoham's notion of preferential entailment, and reflection on the question why such a strengthening is necessary provides some insight into the relation between default logic and circumscription. 1980 Mathematical Subject Classification: B22, B5
منابع مشابه
AI – 1994 - 07 Logical Considerations on Default Semantics
We consider a reinterpretation of the rules of default logic. We make Reiter’s default rules into a constructive method of building models, not theories. To allow reasoning in first order systems, we equip standard first-order logic with a (new) Kleene 3-valued partial model semantics. Then, using our methodology, we add defaults to this semantic system. The result is that our logic is an ordin...
متن کاملInaccessible Worlds and Irrelevance: Preliminary Report
Recently, the relationship between several forms of default reasoning based on conditional defaults has been investigated. In particular, the systems based on ε-semantics, preferential models, and (fragments of) modally-defined conditional logics have been shown to be equivalent. These systems form a plausible core for default inference, but are too weak in general, failing to deal adequately w...
متن کاملA Fully Model-Theoretic Semantics for Model-Preference Default Systems
Propositional systems of default inference based on the dyadic relation of preference between models have recently been proposed by Selman and Kautz to provide a computationally tractable mechanism for the generation of vivid knowledge bases. In this paper we argue that the formalism proposed, albeit endowed with a semantic flavour, is not a model-theoretic (or denotational) semantics, as no on...
متن کاملNonmonotonic Belief State Frames and Reasoning Frames (extended abstract)
In this paper five levels of specification of nonmonotonic reasoning are distinguished. The notions of semantical frame, belief state frame and reasoning frame are introduced and used as a semantical basis for the first three levels. Moreover, the semantical connections between the levels are formalized. It is shown that this general semantical framework is applicable for some well-known approa...
متن کاملA Cumulative-Model Semantics for Dynamic Preferences on Assumptions
Explicit preferences on assumptions as used in prioritized circumscription [McCarthy, 1986; Lifschitz, 1985; Grosof, 1991] and preferred subtheories [Brewka, 1989] provide a clear and declarative method for defining preferred models. In this paper, we show how to embed preferences in the logical theory itself. This gives a high freedom for expressing statements about preferences. Preferences ca...
متن کامل